Skip to main content

    Resources for teachers

    Data and AI in the classroom: a teacher's guide

    Everything a teacher needs to bring data and AI to life: games you can run tomorrow, a language model small enough to read in full, a spreadsheet to clean, charts that can be made to say anything, the true story of the model that graded 2020, the honest careers evidence, and the rules on putting students' data into AI tools. Free, sourced line by line, and written by people who would genuinely like your students to enjoy it and to ask better questions of every chart and chatbot they meet.

    For teachers. Every figure is sourced and was checked on 1 November 2026. Every dataset, machine and sentence in these activities is made up. Nothing a student types into the interactive activities is stored or sent anywhere, and nobody is identified by any of the examples.

    The activities

    Run these in your classroom

    Everything below works in a normal lesson. Most of it needs one projector. Three activities can be run with no devices at all: the starter, the discussion on the 2020 grades, and the pipeline if you print the table from the pack. Timings are our suggestions from how long each takes to run, so adjust them to your group, and every activity has teacher notes, answers and discussion questions in the downloadable pack. The numbers in the games are invented for teaching, and each activity says so.

    • Works with no devices

      Your data trail

      A ten minute starter: everyone lists the data they created before breakfast, and who now holds it. Nobody has to share their own list.

      10 to 15 minutes

    • Needs a screen

      Teach the machine

      Show a machine some examples, watch it draw its own rule, then feed it a lopsided set and watch it fail the group it has barely seen.

      25 to 35 minutes

    • Needs a screen

      Predict the next word

      A tiny language model you can read in full. See how a chatbot can sound sure and be wrong, with every probability on show.

      20 to 30 minutes

    • Needs a screen

      Make the same data say three things

      One year of made-up library loans, three honest-looking charts, three different headlines. Then spot the tricks.

      20 to 25 minutes

    • Needs a screen

      Clean the mess

      A spreadsheet with seven things wrong with it. Find them, then see what they did to the class average.

      20 to 30 minutes

    • Needs a screen

      Correlation is not causation

      Umbrellas and lateness rise together. Does one cause the other? Colour the days by weather and watch the pattern vanish.

      20 to 25 minutes

    • Works with no devices

      From raw data to a decision

      Seven stages from a question to a model in use, what goes wrong at each one, and the real jobs that do the work.

      20 to 30 minutes

    • Works with no devices

      Discussion: the 2020 grades

      A model that really did decide something about students their age. What it did, what Ofqual says, and what a fair system would need.

      30 to 40 minutes

    • Needs a screen

      Before you paste it in

      A short checker for teachers: should this go into an AI tool? It shows what the DfE and the NCSC actually say.

      5 to 10 minutes

    • Needs a screen

      Nine kinds of data job

      Explore the nine areas of Data and AI work, with the roles, what they suit and pay with its source. Not everyone needs to love maths.

      15 to 20 minutes

    • Needs a screen

      Hard hats, drones and data centres

      Data has to be captured, stored and checked somewhere physical. Here are the on-site careers that do it.

      10 to 15 minutes

    Download the teacher pack. Timings, step-by-step instructions, discussion questions, answers and sources for every activity, as a PDF or an editable Word file you can adapt.

    Why it matters

    The case for teaching it

    We could just say that AI is changing everything and leave it there, and plenty of people do. But you are the one standing in front of a room full of students who will check, so here is what the evidence really says, including the awkward bits, because the awkward bits are where the good lessons live.

    The field is real and it is growing. The latest government study counts thousands of UK AI companies, a workforce of well over a hundred thousand and revenue in the billions, and then, to its credit, tells you not to take the growth figures at face value, because part of the rise is down to the researchers finding more firms, not only firms getting bigger. That is a lesson in data in itself, and we would use it in class. The skills shortage is real too, but it is a particular shape: employers say the hardest roles to fill are the experienced ones, because candidates lack work experience, not because nobody is interested.

    And the door is wider than the stereotype. Graduate routes are the most common way in, but apprenticeships have gone from a rarity to something nearly a fifth of organisations use for junior roles, most organisations also hire people who have come from a job that had nothing to do with AI, and the survey reports that psychology and philosophy are turning up alongside computer science. It is also honest to say that only a fifth of AI roles are held by women, and that has been falling. So the message for your students is not 'this is easy' and it is not 'this is for someone else', it is that there are lots of ways in, real skill is noticed, and the field would be better with more of them in it.

    Closer to home

    Your school or college is in the figures too

    This is the part that makes a staff room go quiet. Surveys of young people and teachers in 2026 suggest that most of your students already use generative AI, that around six in ten of the older ones use it every week, and that about a quarter say they simply copy what it gives them. Most teachers use it too, six in ten of them are worried about their students using it, and only about a third have had training on how to think about it critically.

    Treat these as indicative: they are self-reported, they come from surveys with their own limits, and the largest one is about literacy rather than AI as such. But they tell you something that changes how to teach this subject. You are not introducing a new technology to a class that has never seen it. You are helping a class that already uses it to use it with their eyes open, and that is a much better place to teach from. The same goes for the next stage: nearly every undergraduate in a national survey said they use AI, and a growing minority put AI-written text straight into assessed work.

    Starter: your data trail

    Before you say the word data, ask everyone to write down every single thing they or their devices created between waking up and arriving at school. The alarm, the message to a friend, the route the bus took, the tap on the card reader, the photo of the cereal, the game that told you your streak was in danger. It usually takes two minutes to fill a page, and the silence while it happens is the sound of a class discovering that data is not something that lives in a spreadsheet in an office, it is something they produce simply by being alive in the twenty-first century.

    That is the whole opportunity of this subject. Data and AI can feel like a thing that happens to other people, in other buildings, with a lot of maths. It is much closer than that, and a student who has worked out that their own morning is a dataset is already asking the questions this subject needs: who holds it, who is it useful to, and what would a machine learn if it only ever saw my morning and nobody else's?

    Your data trail

    A ten minute starter: everyone lists the data they created before breakfast, and who now holds it. Nobody has to share their own list.

    10 to 15 minutesPaper and pens. No devices.

    What this is

    A ten minute warm-up with pen and paper. No computers are needed.

    What to do

    1. Give everyone a sheet of paper. For two minutes, in silence, they list everything they or their devices made between waking up and arriving for the day: the alarm, a message, the bus tap, a photo.
    2. Next to each item they write who now holds that data. A guess is fine.
    3. Collect the most surprising items on the board, with no names. Nobody has to read out their own list.

    What you should notice

    Most students fill a page without trying. Data is not only forms and spreadsheets: it is made by ordinary actions, and other people hold it.

    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Give everyone a sheet of paper and two minutes of silence. Ask them to list every piece of data they or their devices created between waking up and arriving for the day. Suggest prompts if they stall: the alarm, a message, a route, a bus tap, a photo, a game, a purchase.
    2. Now ask them to put a second column next to each item: who now holds it? A phone company, an app, a transport firm, the school or college, a shop. They can guess; the point is the pattern.
    3. Collect the most surprising items on the board, without names. Nobody has to read their own list out.
    4. Finish by asking which of the items could be useful for something good, and which they would want a say in.

    Questions to ask

    • Which of these did you choose to make, and which just happened?
    • Who benefits from holding this data, and is it always the person it is about?
    • If a model learned from all the lists in this room, whose mornings would it understand best?

    Watch for

    • Some students may not want to list things at home. Keep it to the morning and to devices, and let them choose what to share.
    • Do not ask anyone to reveal anything that could identify another person.
    • This is general discussion, not advice about any particular app's settings.

    Students will be able to: name at least five pieces of data they create in an ordinary morning. say who holds one of them and why. explain that data about a person is made by their ordinary actions, not only by filling in forms.

    Game: teach the machine

    Teach the machine

    Show a machine some examples, watch it draw its own rule, then feed it a lopsided set and watch it fail the group it has barely seen.

    25 to 35 minutesA projector for the whole class, or one device per pair.

    What this is

    A factory has two kinds of machine, A (circles) and B (squares). Each is a dot on the chart, orange if it was about to fail and green if it was healthy. A computer studies the dots you give it, colours the chart green or orange as its own rule, then is scored on 40 machines it has never seen. Healthy kind B machines read higher than healthy kind A ones, so they sit in an area that is orange for kind A.

    What to do

    1. Press Fair mix. Look at the three scores on the right: overall, kind A and kind B. They should all be high and close together.
    2. Press Mostly kind A. This set has plenty of kind A examples and almost none from kind B. Look at the scores again: overall still looks fine, but kind B has dropped a long way.
    3. Press Add 5 typical healthy kind B examples. Watch the kind B score recover. Press the faulty button too if you like.
    4. Tick Show the 40 test machines to see the hollow markers the rule is scored on, and which ones it gets wrong.

    What you should notice

    The overall score hid the problem. The rule failed the group it had barely seen, and the fix was to give it examples of that group. A model only knows what its examples taught it.

    How to read the chart. Each dot is one machine: how far across is its Reading 1 and how far up is its Reading 2. Orange dots were about to fail and green dots were healthy. The coloured background is the computer's own rule: it would call a new machine in the green area healthy and one in the orange area faulty. All the machines and numbers are made up.

    Ten healthy and ten faulty examples of each kind of machine. 40 examples: 20 from kind A and 20 from kind B.

    Reading 1, from 0 to 100Reading 2, from 0 to 100
    • Kind A
    • Kind B
    • Healthy example
    • Faulty example

    How well does its rule work on 40 machines it has never seen?

    Overall93%
    Kind A machines90%
    Kind B machines95%

    The rule does about as well for both kinds of machine (90% and 95%).

    Add an example of your own

    The quickest way: press one of the two buttons below to add five typical kind B machines. Healthy kind B machines usually read about 65 across and 45 up, and faulty ones about 90 across and 85 up. To place a machine yourself, choose what it is, then click the chart or type its two readings and press Add.

    To label a new reading, the machine finds the closest examples it has seen and goes with the majority.

    See the examples as a table
    No.KindReading 1Reading 2Label
    1A3629.9healthy
    2A20.225.6healthy
    3A37.923.3healthy
    4A30.730healthy
    5A23.132.3healthy
    6A25.221.4healthy
    7A28.840.6healthy
    8A20.618.7healthy
    9A43.635.8healthy
    10A27.330.9healthy
    11A57.977.5faulty
    12A77.373.2faulty
    13A49.564faulty
    14A56.462.6faulty
    15A64.955.3faulty
    16A59.971.3faulty
    17A79.164.4faulty
    18A64.681.8faulty
    19A60.563faulty
    20A6666.8faulty
    21B47.148.9healthy
    22B61.839.1healthy
    23B52.744.8healthy
    24B54.336.2healthy
    25B59.646.9healthy
    26B66.353.1healthy
    27B79.240.7healthy
    28B6444.1healthy
    29B63.644.3healthy
    30B73.450.7healthy
    31B85.585.4faulty
    32B87.486.6faulty
    33B88.280.8faulty
    34B9484.1faulty
    35B82.985.8faulty
    36B90.586.5faulty
    37B88.991faulty
    38B9384.7faulty
    39B85.394.5faulty
    40B91.389.2faulty

    What this shows, and what it does not. It shows how a model gets its rule from the examples it is given, so a rule learned mostly from one group can work badly for another. The method is called nearest neighbours, and real systems use cleverer ones, but they too learn from examples. It says nothing about how big any real-world problem is: for that, read the Gender Shades evidence below.

    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Open with the Fair mix preset. Point out the two kinds of machine, circles and squares, and that healthy and faulty readings are different colours. Show the coloured regions: that is the rule the machine drew for itself from the examples.
    2. Read out the scores for the hidden test machines: overall, for group A and for group B. They should be high and similar.
    3. Switch to Mostly group A, which has almost no examples of group B. Ask the class to predict what will happen to each score before you click. Then reveal it.
    4. Add a few group B points yourself by clicking on the chart where group B readings sit, and watch the group B score recover. Ask why.
    5. Try the Tiny set and change the number of neighbours to see how a small, noisy set makes a jumpy rule.

    Questions to ask

    • Who was left out of the training examples, and who paid for that?
    • If you only looked at the overall score, would you have noticed the problem?
    • Where could this happen for real, such as a tool trained mostly on one kind of person or one kind of device?
    • What would you do to fix it, and who would need to be involved?

    Watch for

    • All the numbers are invented, and the machines are not real. The activity shows the mechanism, not the size of any real-world problem. The real-world evidence is the Gender Shades study in the box under the game.
    • The method is called nearest neighbours: the machine looks at the closest examples it has seen and goes with the majority. Real systems use cleverer methods, but they also learn from the examples they are given.
    • Students may say the machine is being unfair on purpose. It has no intentions; it reproduces the examples it was given.

    Students will be able to: explain that a model learns its rule from the examples it is given. show how an unrepresentative training set makes a model work worse for the people it left out. say why one overall accuracy figure is not enough.

    Lab: predict the next word

    Predict the next word

    A tiny language model you can read in full. See how a chatbot can sound sure and be wrong, with every probability on show.

    20 to 30 minutesA projector or one device per pair.

    What this is

    A very small chatbot you can read in full. It has seen 38 short made-up sentences and nothing else. For any start, it counts which word came next in those sentences and offers the likeliest, with how likely each one is.

    What to do

    1. Leave the start as The cat sat on the. Look at the list on the right: mat comes first at 63%, because it came next most often in the sentences it read.
    2. Click a word to add it to the sentence, and click more to build one. Or press Pick one for me and let it choose in proportion to the percentages.
    3. Move the Creativity slider to the left and pick a few times, then to the right and pick a few times. Left plays safe, right lets unlikely words in.
    4. Now press The capital of Australia is. It offers Sydney at 60% and Canberra at 40%.

    What you should notice

    It does not know anything. It picks what was most common in the text it read, and that text had a mistake in it, so the likeliest answer is the wrong one. Likely is not the same as true, which is why real chatbots can sound sure and be wrong.

    This is a toy language model, small enough to read in full. It has seen 38 short invented sentences, listed at the bottom, and nothing else. Given some words, it counts which word followed them, and offers the likeliest. Pick a start, then choose words to build a sentence, or let it choose.

    The sentence so far

    The cat sat on the ...

    Plays safe: the favourite almost always winsAdventurous: unlikely words get a turn

    What the model thinks comes next

    It has seen the words "on the" together, so it looks at what came next each time.

    What this shows, and what it does not. It shows the core move of a language model: choosing a likely continuation. The NCSC describes real ones as turning the relationships between words into a probability model. This toy only counts word pairs in a few dozen sentences. Real models are trained on vastly more text and use far more powerful methods, so do not take the numbers here as how any real tool behaves.

    Everything the model has ever read (38 sentences)
    • The cat sat on the mat. (seen 3 times)
    • The cat sat on the sofa.
    • The cat sat on the wall.
    • The dog sat on the mat. (seen 2 times)
    • The dog sat on the step.
    • The dog chased the cat. (seen 2 times)
    • The dog chased the ball.
    • The cat chased the mouse. (seen 2 times)
    • The teacher marked the books. (seen 2 times)
    • The teacher read the register.
    • The teacher opened the window.
    • The students read the books. (seen 2 times)
    • The students opened the window.
    • The students wrote the answers. (seen 2 times)
    • It was sunny so the students went outside. (seen 3 times)
    • It was sunny so the teacher opened the window.
    • It was raining so the students stayed inside. (seen 2 times)
    • The capital of France is Paris. (seen 3 times)
    • The capital of Japan is Tokyo. (seen 2 times)
    • The capital of Australia is Sydney. (seen 3 times)
    • The capital of Australia is Canberra. (seen 2 times)

    The sentences about the capital of Australia are the planted mistake: the made-up text says Sydney more often than Canberra, which is wrong.

    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Start with the prompt 'the cat sat on the'. Show the options and the probabilities. Ask what the model is doing: counting which word followed those words in its training sentences.
    2. Click the likeliest word a few times to build a sentence. Then press 'Pick one for me' a few times and compare the results. Move the creativity slider up and down and note what changes.
    3. Open the training sentences. Read a few aloud. Ask the class where the options came from. (From these sentences, and nowhere else.)
    4. Now use the prompt 'the capital of australia is'. Point out that the most likely word is not the true one, because the made-up training sentences contain a common mistake. Ask what a real system would do if the text it learned from contained a mistake many times.
    5. Show the NCSC fact: the NCSC describes a language model as turning the relationships between words into a probability model.

    Questions to ask

    • Why can a model sound confident when it is wrong?
    • What would make it more likely to be right? What would not?
    • Why might the NCSC advise against typing sensitive information into a public chatbot?
    • What is the difference between 'likely to be said' and 'true'?

    Watch for

    • This is a toy. It counts word pairs in a few dozen invented sentences. Real models are trained on vastly more text with far more powerful methods. What they share with this toy is the core move: choosing a likely continuation.
    • The made-up mistake about Australia is there on purpose and is clearly shown. Do not let the class leave thinking that is a real fact about any real tool.
    • Randomness only happens when you press the button, so the page is the same for everyone when it loads.

    Students will be able to: describe a language model as something that picks a likely next word. explain why a likely answer is not the same as a true one. say what the creativity setting changes.

    Lab: make the same data say three things

    Make the same data say three things

    One year of made-up library loans, three honest-looking charts, three different headlines. Then spot the tricks.

    20 to 25 minutesA projector or one device per pair.

    What this is

    Twelve months of made-up library loans drawn as a chart. You can change which months it shows, where the vertical axis starts, and whether it is bars or a line. The dark box above the chart shows the headline the chart seems to give.

    What to do

    1. Look at the chart as it opens: the whole year, axis from zero. The headline says loans are up 4.9% and the bars look almost the same height.
    2. Press At 470 under Where the vertical axis starts. The numbers have not changed, but the bars now look hugely different. The box tells you how many times higher the last bar looks and how many times higher it really is.
    3. Press March to August. The headline flips to down 7.5%. Then press August to December: up 9.2%.
    4. Press Line to see the same data as a line.

    What you should notice

    One set of twelve numbers gave three true headlines. A chart is built from choices, such as where the axis starts and which months to show. Always ask what those choices were and why.

    The chart below shows twelve months of loans from a library. The numbers are invented. Change one choice at a time and watch what happens to the headline. Every chart here is drawn from the same twelve numbers.

    Which months
    Where the vertical axis starts
    Type of chart

    The headline this chart invites

    Library loans up 4.9% (Jan to Dec)

    In the numbers, Dec is 1.05 times Jan. On this chart, it looks like 1.05 times.

    0100200300400500510520530525515500495490505515525535JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecBooks borrowed per month

    The three headlines from one year of numbers

    • The whole year (Jan to Dec): up 4.9% (510 to 535)
    • March to August: down 7.5% (530 to 490)
    • August to December: up 9.2% (490 to 535)

    All three are true. A headline is a choice about which months to look at.

    Questions to ask any chart

    • Where does the vertical axis start? Bars are meant to start at zero, because their height is the amount.
    • Why these months, and what do the others show?
    • What is missing, and who made it, and why?
    • Does the headline say how big the change is in real terms, or only that there is one?

    Starting a line chart above zero can be reasonable when small changes matter, as long as the axis is clearly labelled. It is the unlabelled, unexplained version that misleads. Percentages are rounded to one decimal place.

    See the twelve numbers
    JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
    510520530525515500495490505515525535
    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Show the chart with the defaults: a bar chart of the whole year starting from zero. Ask for a headline. Probably something like 'loans are steady, up a little'.
    2. Now start the axis at 470 instead of zero. The same bars look dramatically different. Ask what changed. (Only the axis.)
    3. Switch the window to March to August, then August to December. Ask students to write the headline for each. Point out they are all true and they say different things.
    4. Switch to a line chart and ask whether it feels more or less honest than bars. (Bars start from zero for a reason: the height is the amount.)
    5. Finish by asking what you would need to ask the person who made the chart.

    Questions to ask

    • Which of these headlines would you believe from a stranger? Which would you ask more about?
    • Is it ever reasonable to start an axis above zero? (For a line chart where the small changes matter, yes, if it is clearly labelled.)
    • Who benefits when a chart looks dramatic?

    Watch for

    • The numbers are invented for the exercise. They are not real library figures.
    • Avoid presenting the zoomed chart as 'lying'. It is the choice that misleads when it is not labelled, so teach students to read the axis.

    Students will be able to: spot a truncated axis and a cherry-picked time window. explain how the same figures can support opposite headlines. ask what a chart leaves out before believing it.

    Game: clean the mess

    Clean the mess

    A spreadsheet with seven things wrong with it. Find them, then see what they did to the class average.

    20 to 30 minutesA projector or one device per pair.

    What this is

    A made-up class survey in a spreadsheet, with seven mistakes of the kind real data often has. Your job is to find them before the answers are shown.

    What to do

    1. Read the table. Click any cell that looks wrong and it turns yellow. Click a row number to mark a whole row, for a row you think was entered twice. Click again to undo.
    2. Press Check my flags. Green means a real mistake you found, orange means a real mistake you missed, red means a cell that was fine.
    3. Read the two class average heights: the one the spreadsheet gives from the messy data, and the one after cleaning.
    4. Read the seven cards to see what each mistake was and what to do about it. Press Start again to have another go.

    What you should notice

    A few bad cells change an average, and two mistakes can pull in opposite directions so they hide each other. Cleaning data takes judgement, and sometimes the honest answer is to leave a value out and ask.

    Someone surveyed a class of students and typed the answers into a spreadsheet. The class and the numbers are invented. There are seven things wrong with it. Click any cell that looks wrong to flag it. Click a row number to flag a whole row. When you are ready, check your flags.

    RowGroupHeight (cm)How they travelMinutes to school

    0 cells flagged so far.

    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Tell the class this is a survey of a made-up class. Ask them to flag anything that looks wrong by clicking on it. There are seven problems, though not every problem is a single cell.
    2. When they are ready, check the flags. Go through each problem and what it was. Count how many they found.
    3. Read out the two averages: the one the spreadsheet calculates from the messy data and the one from the cleaned data. Ask why they differ.
    4. Point out that two of the slips pull in opposite directions: the 1.62 drags the average down and the 262 and the copied row push it up, so they partly hide each other. Ask which problem was hardest to spot. (The decimal point in a height is easy to miss.)

    Questions to ask

    • What would a model trained on the messy data have learned?
    • Which of these problems could a computer find on its own, and which needs a human who knows what the numbers mean?
    • What do you do with a value like 262 when you cannot ask the person?

    Watch for

    • The data is entirely invented. The heights are plausible for a class of young people but belong to nobody.
    • In the cleaned figure we remove the impossible 262 rather than guess what it was meant to be. Real analysts often have to make that call, and should say they did.

    Students will be able to: recognise duplicates, wrong units, impossible values, inconsistent labels and missing values. explain how a few bad cells change an average. say why cleaning data is real work and not a chore to skip.

    Lab: correlation is not causation

    Correlation is not causation

    Umbrellas and lateness rise together. Does one cause the other? Colour the days by weather and watch the pattern vanish.

    20 to 25 minutesA projector or one device per pair.

    What this is

    Forty made-up days. Each dot is one day: across is how many umbrellas the shop sold, up is how many students arrived late. The box on the right gives a correlation number, from -1 to 1, which says how closely two things rise and fall together.

    What to do

    1. Look at the chart before you click anything. The dots slope upwards and the correlation is about 0.78, which is strong. Ask the class: do umbrellas make students late?
    2. Tick Colour the days by weather. Rainy days become blue circles and dry days become orange squares.
    3. Read the two new numbers, one for rainy days only and one for dry days only. They are close to zero.
    4. Try the three Find the third factor boxes at the bottom: decide what the hidden cause is, then press Reveal.

    What you should notice

    The pattern is real, but umbrellas do not cause lateness. Rain causes both. Inside each kind of day the link almost disappears. A correlation tells you where to look, not what caused what.

    Each dot is one day. Across the horizontal axis, how many umbrellas the shop sold. Up the vertical axis, how many students arrived late. The days and numbers are invented. Look at the pattern, decide what it means, then colour the days by weather.

    02468101214160510152025Umbrellas sold that dayStudents late that day

    Correlation across all 40 days

    0.78

    A correlation runs from -1 to 1. Near 1 means the two rise together very consistently.

    Before you tick the box: what story would you tell about this pattern? Do umbrellas make students late?

    Your turn: find the third factor

    Three made-up charts. Decide what the hidden third thing is, then reveal.

    • Imagine a made-up chart that shows drivers with more speeding fines also have more parking fines.

    • Imagine a made-up chart that shows the more fire engines at a fire, the more damage the building suffers.

    • Imagine a made-up chart that shows days when more ice creams are sold are also days with more sunburn.

    Correlation is a clue to look further, not a conclusion. This links to the national curriculum maths statement about recognising correlation and knowing that it does not indicate causation.

    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Show the scatter graph with no colours. Ask what the pattern says. Read out the correlation figure. Ask for a story that explains it, and write the students' stories on the board.
    2. Now tick 'Colour the days by weather'. Inside each colour the pattern disappears. Ask what that tells them.
    3. Introduce the term third factor, or confounder. Then work through the three made-up examples at the bottom, asking for a third factor before you reveal each one.
    4. Link it to the GCSE maths statement: recognise correlation and know that it does not indicate causation.

    Questions to ask

    • Does selling an umbrella make anyone late? What does?
    • If you only had the two columns and not the weather, how could you tell?
    • When a news story says 'linked to', what should you ask?

    Watch for

    • The days and figures are invented. The pattern was built in on purpose, to show the mechanism.
    • Some students will say 'so correlation means nothing'. It does not: correlation is a clue to look further, not a conclusion.

    Students will be able to: read a scatter graph and describe the correlation. explain what a third factor is and how it can create a pattern. suggest a third factor for a new example.

    Diagram: from raw data to a decision

    From raw data to a decision

    Seven stages from a question to a model in use, what goes wrong at each one, and the real jobs that do the work.

    20 to 30 minutesA projector, or the printed table in the teacher pack.

    What this is

    Every model goes through the same seven stages, from asking a question to being used on real people. This diagram lets you click through them one at a time.

    What to do

    1. Click stage 1, Ask a question. Read what happens and what can go wrong. Ask the class what else could go wrong before you read the list.
    2. Look at Who does this work on the right: real jobs from the Career Matrix, with the area of work.
    3. Click stage 5, Test it, and stage 7, Watch it and be ready to change it. These show real evidence: a study of face analysis systems and the 2020 exam grades.
    4. Follow the See it in action link to jump to the activity that shows that stage.

    What you should notice

    Many problems start early, in what data is collected and who is left out, and only show up at the end. Lots of different jobs are involved, and not all of them are coding.

    Every model, from a school timetable tool to a chatbot, goes through the same stages. Pick one to see what happens, what goes wrong, and which jobs in the Career Matrix do the work.

    Stage 1 of 7

    Ask a question

    Decide what you are trying to find out or predict, who it is for, and what a good answer would look like.

    What can go wrong
    • Measuring what is easy to count instead of what matters.
    • Asking a question the data cannot answer.
    • Nobody asks who will be affected.
    Who does this work
    • Area 08: Data & AI Product Management

      Turning data and models into products people actually use

      AI Product Manager, Data Product Manager, ML Product Owner, Platform Product Manager

    • Area 02: Analytics & Decision Intelligence

      Turning data into actionable insight

      Data Analyst, Business Intelligence Developer, Decision Scientist, Analytics Lead

    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Click through the seven stages together, one at a time. For each, ask the class what could go wrong before you show the box.
    2. Pick two stages and look at the real jobs named under them. Notice they are different kinds of job: some are engineering, some are about people and decisions.
    3. Where a stage has a real example attached, the 2020 grades or the Gender Shades study, read the evidence box and ask whether the problem was a technical one, a people one, or both.
    4. Set a short task: pick an app they use and name one thing that could go wrong at each stage.

    Questions to ask

    • Which stage do you think is most often skipped, and why?
    • Which of these jobs would suit you, and which would you hate?
    • Where does a human need to be involved?

    Watch for

    • This is a simplification. Real projects loop back between stages and run several at once.
    • The jobs shown are the ones the Career Matrix lists for the matching area of work, with their pay and sources in the career guide.

    Students will be able to: order the stages of building and using a model. give one thing that can go wrong at each stage. name two jobs in Data and AI and say which stage they work on.

    Two true stories

    When a model decides something about people

    The abstract version of 'bias in AI' slides off most students, so give them the concrete one. In 2018 researchers published a test of commercial systems that tried to tell whether a face belonged to a man or a woman. The researchers split the results by group and found that the system's worst group and its best group were a very long way apart, as the figures below show. A single overall score, it turns out, is a lovely way to hide the people a system does not work for. The Teach the machine game above lets your students make that happen with their own hands, in a toy with made-up machines, before they read the real thing.

    The second story is closer to home, because it happened to people the age of your sixth form and their older siblings. In summer 2020 exams were cancelled, and a standardisation process produced calculated grades that Ofqual compared with the centre assessment grades submitted by schools and colleges. The published figures show how often the calculated grade matched, beat or fell below the submitted grade, and Ofqual's own annual report says the approach did not command public confidence and was changed. We have set out exactly what the sources say and nothing more, because the useful lesson is not who was right, it is what a fair system needs: a way to check an individual result, a way to challenge it, and someone accountable.

    Discussion: the 2020 grades

    A model that really did decide something about students their age. What it did, what Ofqual says, and what a fair system would need.

    30 to 40 minutesThe facts below. No devices.

    What this is

    A discussion with no devices. In summer 2020 exams were cancelled and a computer process helped decide grades. The published facts are in the evidence boxes just above, and everything said in the lesson should come from them.

    What to do

    1. Read the evidence boxes aloud. Check everyone knows what a centre assessment grade was: the grade each school or college submitted.
    2. In pairs, ask: if the calculated grade matched the submitted grade for most students, was it a good system? Take answers.
    3. Tell them that where the two differed, the calculated grade was far more often lower than higher.
    4. Ask what a fair system would need. Look for a way to check an individual result, a way to challenge it, and someone accountable.

    What you should notice

    A system can be right for most people and still wrong for you. What matters is whether people can check it and challenge it. Some students or staff may have been affected, so stick to what the sources say.

    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Share the facts in the box. Check the class knows what a centre assessment grade was: the grade each school or college submitted for its students, in place of exams. Keep it factual.
    2. Ask in pairs: if a calculated grade matches the teacher's grade for most students, is it a good system? Take answers.
    3. Reveal the other side: for the A level entries where the two differed, it was far more often lower than higher.
    4. Ask what a fair system would have needed: a way to check individual results, a way to appeal, someone accountable, a way to change course. Compare with the ICO safeguards in the box.
    5. Finish with what actually happened: Ofqual's own report says the approach did not command public confidence, and the grades were changed to the higher of the two.

    Questions to ask

    • A model can be right for most people and still wrong for you. Is that acceptable? Who decides?
    • Who should be able to challenge a decision made by a model?
    • What would you have wanted to know before it was used?

    Watch for

    • Some students, siblings or staff in your school or college were affected, and some may have strong feelings. Keep to what the published sources say and do not guess about causes.
    • The activity is about the idea of a model deciding things about people, not about blaming anyone. Ofqual's report is the account to rely on.
    • This is general information, not legal advice.

    Students will be able to: state what happened in 2020 using the published figures. explain why a model that is right on average can still be unfair to individuals. say what safeguards the law and good practice expect when a decision is automated.

    Careers

    Nine kinds of data job

    Nine kinds of data job

    Explore the nine areas of Data and AI work, with the roles, what they suit and pay with its source. Not everyone needs to love maths.

    15 to 20 minutesA projector or one device per pair.

    What this is

    Nine kinds of work in data and AI, taken from the TechSkills Career Matrix, with the jobs in each, what each suits and the pay with its source.

    What to do

    1. Click each of the nine boxes in turn.
    2. For each one, read the jobs and the line that starts Best suited to.
    3. Where there is a gold box labelled a route into this area, read it: that is the apprenticeship or hands-on way in.
    4. Ask students which area they could picture themselves in, and why.

    What you should notice

    Data and AI is not one job. Some areas are about building, some about deciding and some about being on site, and several do not need strong coding. Pay figures come with their source and date, so quote them with that.

    9 areas of work in Data and AI, from the TechSkills Career Matrix. Pick one to see what the work is, the jobs in it, what it suits and what it pays, with the source for the pay.

    Area 01

    Data Foundations & Engineering

    Building the infrastructure that makes data usable

    Before insights or AI can exist, data must be collected, cleaned, structured, and made accessible.

    Jobs in this area
    Data Engineer, Analytics Engineer, Database Specialist, Data Platform Engineer
    Best suited to
    Engineers who enjoy solving complex systems and infrastructure challenges.
    Pay, with its source
    £33,515 to £90,000+ (database administrator, ONS ASHE, to lead data engineer, IT Jobs Watch UK)
    Industries that hire for it
    Financial Services, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Telecommunications, Government & Public Sector

    A hands-on route into this area

    Construction Technology & Geospatial Surveying

    Capturing the data that describes the physical world, on site rather than in an office.

    Surveying Technician, Engineering Design Technician (BIM/CAD), Geospatial Survey Technician

    Pay: £32,905 to £47,519 (median, surveying technician to chartered surveyor)

    Pay is quoted as the Career Matrix gives it, with its own source and date: use it with that, and not as a promise. See the full Data and AI careers page.

    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Pick one student interest at random, such as sport, music, fashion, games or health. Ask which of the nine areas could involve it.
    2. Click through areas that match. Read the 'best suited to' line aloud, and the pay with its source.
    3. Point out the apprenticeship routes where there is one, and say plainly that they are in addition to degrees, not instead of them.

    Questions to ask

    • Which area would you not have thought of as a tech job?
    • Which would suit someone who does not enjoy maths? Does any?

    Watch for

    • Pay is quoted as the Career Matrix gives it, with its own source and date. Quote it with that, not as a promise.
    • Not every area has a hands-on or apprenticeship route.

    Students will be able to: name at least four different Data and AI jobs. match a student's interests to an area of the field. find an apprenticeship route into one of them.

    Hard hats, drones and data centres

    Data and AI is not only for people who like screens

    Here is something that surprises most students and quite a few teachers: data has to come from somewhere, and a surprising amount of it comes from someone in a hi-vis jacket. Our Career Matrix has a name for the genuinely physical, on-site routes, Hard Hat Tech, and five of our eight career families have one. In Data and AI there are two. One is the surveyor, who captures the real world as measurements with laser scanners, GPS equipment and mapping drones. The other is the inspection engineer, who uses ultrasound and other imaging to check the materials, welds and components of safety-critical equipment for hidden flaws, without taking anything apart.

    Then there is the place all the data finally lives. A data centre is a building full of computers, and in 2024 the government announced it would designate data centres as Critical National Infrastructure, with the aim of making the data in them less likely to be compromised in outages and cyber attacks. If your students think of AI as something that happens in the cloud, it is worth telling them the cloud has a postcode.

    Drones are the perfect doorway, because students already find them thrilling and they really are used for surveying. If your school or college wants a drone club, the rules changed on 1 January 2026, and the box below says exactly how.

    Hard hats, drones and data centres

    Data has to be captured, stored and checked somewhere physical. Here are the on-site careers that do it.

    10 to 15 minutesA projector or the page on a phone.

    What this is

    Two hands-on jobs in the Data and AI family, from the Career Matrix, and the reason data centres are treated as national infrastructure.

    What to do

    1. Read the two route cards and ask what data each job captures or checks.
    2. Read the data centre fact in the box above them.
    3. If you have a drone club, or want one, read the CAA rules in the evidence box together.

    What you should notice

    Data has to be captured, stored and checked somewhere physical, and that work is done by people on site as well as people at screens.

    • Area 01: Data Foundations and Engineering

      Construction Technology & Geospatial Surveying

      Capturing the data that describes the physical world, on site rather than in an office.

      Before any dataset, 3D model or map exists, someone has to capture the real world accurately: laser-scanning a construction site, surveying land with GPS equipment, or flying a mapping drone. This is data engineering's on-site, hands-on entry point.

      Surveying Technician, Engineering Design Technician (BIM/CAD), Geospatial Survey Technician

      Pay, with its source: £32,905 to £47,519 (median, surveying technician to chartered surveyor)

    • Area 09: Asset Integrity and Inspection Engineering

      Non-Destructive Testing (NDT)

      Hands-on inspection of real components and structures, through a paid apprenticeship rather than an engineering degree.

      Inspect materials, welds and components on site or in a test facility using ultrasonic, radiographic and other non-destructive methods, working towards industry-recognised NDT certification rather than starting with a standalone degree.

      NDT Operator Apprentice, NDT Engineering Technician, Inspection Engineer

      Pay, with its source: £22,000 to £45,000+ (Level 2 operator apprentice to Level 3 engineering technician, Glassdoor/Indeed UK benchmarks)

    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Read the two hands-on routes. Ask what data each of them captures or checks.
    2. Show the data centre fact. Ask what a data centre is and why anyone would protect it like a power station.
    3. If you have a drone or a drone club, read the CAA rules box together first.

    Questions to ask

    • Who has to go out in all weathers so that the data is right?
    • If the data from an inspection is wrong, who is affected?

    Watch for

    • Pay and roles are as the Career Matrix gives them. The drone rules are the CAA's from 1 January 2026.
    • Never fly a drone near people or without checking the CAA's current rules first.

    Students will be able to: name two hands-on routes in the Data and AI family. explain why a data centre is infrastructure. state the basic rule for flying a drone in the UK.

    Before you paste it in

    Using AI tools in your classroom: what the rules say

    Sooner or later a colleague will ask whether they can use an AI tool to write reports or mark homework, and a student will ask whether they can use one for coursework. It is far better to know the short version before either happens. The Department for Education is clear that it sees more immediate benefit and fewer risks from teachers using these tools than from students using them, and equally clear that the teacher stays responsible for the result.

    The practical rules are short. Do not put personal data into a public tool, and if you think you need to, ask your data protection officer or IT lead first. Check what comes out, because these tools can state falsehoods with perfect confidence. Check age limits before students use anything, and make sure there is supervision and filtering. Do not let students' original work be used to train a model without permission. And for anything that counts towards a qualification, read the current JCQ guidance and your exam board's before you set it. The checker below turns this into six questions you can answer in a minute.

    This is general information to help you teach, not legal advice, and the DfE pages are the place to read the detail.

    Before you paste it in

    A short checker for teachers: should this go into an AI tool? It shows what the DfE and the NCSC actually say.

    5 to 10 minutesA device. Also useful on a staff meeting screen.

    What this is

    A checklist for teachers. It asks six questions about something you are thinking of putting into an AI tool, and shows what government guidance says about each. Nothing you tick is stored.

    What to do

    1. Think of a real task, such as writing report comments or marking a piece of homework.
    2. Answer Yes or No to each of the six questions.
    3. Read the box that appears at the bottom. It lists what you should do and the guidance behind it, with the source.

    What you should notice

    The short version is: keep personal data out, check what comes out, mind age limits, and follow the rules for qualifications. This is a summary of the sources, not legal advice, so ask your data protection officer when in doubt.

    Thinking of putting something into an AI tool? Answer these six questions about it. Nothing you tick is stored or sent anywhere. This is a summary of what the sources say: it is general information, not legal advice, and the DfE pages are the authority.

    1. 1.Does it include names, photos, grades or anything else that could identify a student, parent or member of staff?
    2. 2.Is it a public chatbot, and does what you are typing contain anything sensitive or private?
    3. 3.Is it a student's original work, such as an essay, a drawing or a piece of code?
    4. 4.Is it for coursework, or any assessment that counts towards a qualification?
    5. 5.Will students be using the tool themselves?
    6. 6.Will you give what comes out to students or parents, or use it in a document, without reading it carefully?

    Answer the questions above and the guidance that applies will appear here.

    How to run it, questions to ask, and what to watch for

    Running it

    1. Open the checker on a screen at a staff meeting or in department time. Answer the four questions for a task you actually have in mind.
    2. Read the guidance it shows, with its source. Remind colleagues that the checker is a summary and the DfE pages are the authority.
    3. Ask your data protection officer or IT lead where your school's or college's policy stands, and note the answer for others.

    Questions to ask

    • What is the quickest safe habit that would stop personal data going into a public chatbot?
    • How would you tell students what is and is not allowed for coursework?

    Watch for

    • The checker does not store anything you tick. It shows what the sources say and tells you where to check your own school's or college's policy.
    • Assessment rules change. Read the current JCQ guidance and your exam board's before setting or supervising coursework.
    • This is general information to help you teach. It is not legal advice.

    Students will be able to: say what the DfE recommends about personal data in AI tools. name the checks before students' work goes into one. know where assessment rules sit.

    For teachers

    The Translator

    Data and AI are full of jargon, and nobody wants to bluff their way through it in front of a class. Search any term below for what it means in plain English, a comparison from school life you can use straight away, where that comparison stops working, and what it looks like in a real job.

    29 terms

    • Algorithm

      In plain English
      A set of step-by-step instructions for solving a problem or finishing a task. A computer follows it exactly, in the order given.
      Think of it like this
      A recipe, or the steps for long division. Follow them in order and you get the answer.Where that stops working: Some modern AI systems are not written as steps by a person. They find their own rule from examples, which is what the next few entries are about.
      At work
      Data jobs involve writing or choosing algorithms, and deciding which problem to solve with one is as important as writing the code.
    • Artificial intelligence (AI)

      Also called: AI

      In plain English
      A broad label for computer systems that do things which normally seem to need human intelligence, such as understanding speech, recognising pictures or writing text. It covers many different methods.
      Think of it like this
      'Sport' is a label for football, swimming and chess boxing. AI is a label for many different techniques in the same way.Where that stops working: Nobody agrees exactly where the edge of the label is, and the word is often used for things that are just ordinary software.
      At work
      A job with AI in the title is usually about building, checking or running a particular system, rather than anything as grand as the film version.
    • Automated decision

      Also called: automated decision-making, ADM

      In plain English
      A decision about a person made solely by a computer system with no human involved. The ICO's guidance is about such decisions where they have a legal or similarly significant effect, and the safeguards people should have.
      Think of it like this
      A system that decides automatically which students get a place on a course, with no person looking at it.Where that stops working: This is general information, and the ICO's page is draft guidance under consultation.
      At work
      Governance and operations roles check that decisions made by systems can be explained, challenged and corrected.
    • Average (mean, median, mode)

      Also called: mean, median, mode

      In plain English
      Three ways of describing the middle of some numbers. The mean adds them up and divides, the median is the middle value in order and the mode is the most common.
      Think of it like this
      Three students at the bus stop earn £5 each from a Saturday job and one earns £100. The mean is about £29, the median is £5. Which one is more honest about a typical student?Where that stops working: No single average describes everyone, which is one reason a headline average can hide how different groups do.
      At work
      Choosing which average to report is a real decision, and a good analyst says which one they used.
    • Bias

      Also called: algorithmic bias

      In plain English
      In data and AI, a system that works worse, or gives systematically different results, for some groups of people. It often comes from the examples the system learned from or from choices made in building it.
      Think of it like this
      A school quiz written entirely by students from one friendship group will probably suit that friendship group best.Where that stops working: In everyday life bias suggests someone meant it. A system can be biased with nobody meaning anything.
      At work
      The Career Matrix has a whole area of work, Data Strategy, Governance and Ethics, about using data responsibly, which includes looking for this.
    • Causation

      In plain English
      When one thing really makes another happen. Much harder to show than correlation, and usually needs an experiment or very careful design.
      Think of it like this
      Pressing the switch makes the projector come on. Doing it again and again with the same result is how you know.
      At work
      Applied data scientists run experiments, such as splitting users into groups, to move from 'these go together' to 'this caused that'.
    • Confounder

      Also called: third factor, lurking variable

      In plain English
      A hidden third thing that causes two other things to move together, so they look related when they are not.
      Think of it like this
      Rain makes more umbrellas sell and more students arrive late. Umbrellas do not cause lateness; the weather causes both.
      At work
      Spotting possible confounders is one of the first things an analyst is trained to do.
    • Correlation

      In plain English
      Two things that tend to rise and fall together. It is a pattern in the numbers, and says nothing yet about why.
      Think of it like this
      Students who sit near the radiator tend to be sleepier. The two go together; that does not mean the radiator is the whole reason.Where that stops working: A strong correlation can still be a coincidence or the work of a third thing.
      At work
      Analysts use correlation to decide where to look, not to prove a cause.
    • Critical National Infrastructure (CNI)

      Also called: CNI

      In plain English
      The systems and facilities a country relies on so much that their loss would be serious, such as energy and water. In 2024 the government announced it would designate data centres as CNI.
      Think of it like this
      The school's power supply: nobody thinks about it until it fails, and then nothing works.
      At work
      Data centre engineers and technicians keep this running, and security professionals help protect it.
    • Dashboard

      In plain English
      A single screen of charts and key figures that lets someone keep an eye on how something is going.
      Think of it like this
      The attendance board in the office: one glance tells you which classes need chasing.Where that stops working: A dashboard shows what someone decided to measure and nothing else. The Make the same data say three things activity is a warning about that.
      At work
      Analysts build dashboards. The best ones also say what the dashboard cannot tell you.
    • Data cleaning

      Also called: data wrangling, data preparation

      In plain English
      Finding and fixing errors in data before using it: duplicates, wrong units, impossible values, inconsistent labels and gaps.
      Think of it like this
      Marking your own homework for silly mistakes before you hand it in.Where that stops working: Cleaning involves judgement. The Clean the mess activity has a 262 cm height that nobody can safely correct without asking.
      At work
      Data engineers and analysts do this work. It is not glamorous, and everything after it depends on it.
    • Data pipeline

      In plain English
      The automated route data takes from where it is collected, through cleaning and checking, to where it is used.
      Think of it like this
      Homework moving from your bag, to the teacher's pile, to the mark book, to the report, without anyone retyping it.Where that stops working: A mistake early in the pipeline travels all the way to the end, so the checking has to happen along the way.
      At work
      Data engineers build and maintain pipelines. The Matrix lists the role in its first area of work.
    • Database

      In plain English
      An organised store of data that lets you add, find and change information quickly and reliably.
      Think of it like this
      The school's management system, where one search finds a student, their timetable and their parent's phone number.
      At work
      Database specialists and data engineers keep these running, and the Career Matrix lists them in the Data Foundations and Engineering area.
    • Dataset

      In plain English
      A collection of data organised for a purpose, often rows (one per person, event or item) and columns (one per thing you measured).
      Think of it like this
      The class register: one row per student, one column per thing you record.
      At work
      Nearly every project starts by asking which datasets exist, who owns them and whether they can be used.
    • Generative AI

      Also called: gen AI

      In plain English
      AI that produces new content, such as text, pictures or music, based on patterns it learned from a lot of examples.
      Think of it like this
      A student who has read thousands of stories and can now write one of their own in the same style, without having to copy any single one.Where that stops working: The new content can look convincing and be wrong. See hallucination.
      At work
      Anyone who can judge where generative AI helps and where it does not is useful to an employer.
    • Hallucination

      In plain English
      When an AI tool produces false or nonsensical information and presents it as fact. The DfE describes it in just those words.
      Think of it like this
      A student who has not done the reading and bluffs, in a very confident voice.Where that stops working: A bluffing student knows they are bluffing. A model has no idea.
      At work
      Checking the output of AI tools is part of nearly every job that uses them. The DfE says any content produced requires critical judgement to check for appropriateness and accuracy.
    • Large language model (LLM)

      Also called: LLM, chatbot

      In plain English
      The NCSC describes it as an algorithm trained on a large amount of text that analyses the relationships between words and turns them into a probability model, which it uses to answer. In short, it works out likely continuations of the text it is given.
      Think of it like this
      The Predict the next word activity is a tiny, readable version of the same idea.Where that stops working: The activity counts word pairs in a few dozen sentences. Real models are trained on vastly more text and use far more powerful methods. The shared idea is choosing a likely next word.
      At work
      People who build, test and secure these systems work in machine learning, operations and security roles. The NCSC has published advice on using them safely.
    • Machine learning

      Also called: ML

      In plain English
      A way of making software where, instead of writing the rules by hand, you show a program lots of examples and let it work out the pattern for itself.
      Think of it like this
      Teaching a new student to spot a good sentence by showing them hundreds of good and bad ones, rather than handing them a rulebook.Where that stops working: A person still decides which examples to show and how to judge whether the student has got it right, and that is where many of the problems start.
      At work
      Machine learning engineers build and train these systems. The Career Matrix lists a Level 6 degree apprenticeship route into it.
    • Model

      In plain English
      What machine learning produces once it has learned from data: a pattern-spotting rule you can use on new cases.
      Think of it like this
      The 'feel' a football coach has for a good striker after watching thousands of matches. It is not written down anywhere, but it can be used on a player they have never seen.Where that stops working: A coach can explain a hunch. A model often cannot explain why it decided what it did.
      At work
      Data scientists and machine learning engineers build models. Others check them, run them and keep an eye on them once they are in use.
    • Neural network

      In plain English
      A kind of model made of very many small, connected calculations whose strengths are adjusted during training. The name is loosely inspired by the brain, but it is maths, not a brain.
      Think of it like this
      A huge number of tiny dials. Training is a long process of nudging every dial until the answers improve.Where that stops working: Nobody can read the dials and say what each one means, which is why explaining a decision is hard.
      At work
      Machine learning engineers choose, train and test networks.
    • Outlier

      In plain English
      A value that sits far away from the rest. It might be an error, or it might be the most interesting thing in the dataset.
      Think of it like this
      The one student who scored 100% when everyone else was between 40 and 60. A mistake, or a genius?
      At work
      Analysts look at outliers before deciding what to do with them. Removing them without saying so is a classic way to mislead.
    • Overfitting

      In plain English
      When a model learns its training examples so closely, quirks and mistakes included, that it does badly on new cases.
      Think of it like this
      Learning last year's past paper answers word for word and then freezing when the questions are changed slightly.Where that stops working: A student can tell they are stuck. A model just confidently gives the wrong answer.
      At work
      Testing on data the model has not seen is how teams catch it.
    • Personal data

      In plain English
      Any information about a living person who could be identified from it. In schools it includes names, photos, grades and anything that points to a particular student.
      Think of it like this
      Everything in a student's file, and a photo from the school trip.Where that stops working: The details of the law are for your school's data protection officer. The DfE's advice is to keep personal data out of generative AI tools.
      At work
      Anyone handling data needs to know what counts, who can see it and why it is held. Governance roles in the Matrix focus on this.
    • Prompt

      In plain English
      The text you give an AI tool to say what you want from it.
      Think of it like this
      The question on an exam paper. A vague question gets a vague answer, and a different wording can get a very different one.
      At work
      Writing good prompts is a useful skill, but it is not a substitute for knowing enough about the topic to check the answer.
    • Sample

      In plain English
      The group you actually measure, used to learn about a larger group you cannot measure completely.
      Think of it like this
      Tasting one spoonful of soup to judge the whole pot. It only works if you stir it first.Where that stops working: If the sample is not representative, you learn about the sample and not the pot. The Teach the machine game is that problem in miniature.
      At work
      Whether a sample represents the people a system will be used on is one of the first questions a good team asks.
    • SQL

      In plain English
      A language for asking questions of a database, such as 'show me every order over £50 from last March'.
      Think of it like this
      Asking the librarian for every book on volcanoes published after 2010, in a form the library system understands exactly.Where that stops working: It only answers what you ask. A badly worded question gets a confident wrong answer.
      At work
      Analysts use it to get answers out of databases.
    • Structured and unstructured data

      In plain English
      Structured data fits neatly into rows and columns, like a register. Unstructured data does not, like photos, recordings or free-text comments.
      Think of it like this
      The register is structured. The comments teachers write on reports are not.
      At work
      Much of today's AI work is about making use of unstructured data, and someone still has to organise and check it.
    • Test data

      Also called: test set

      In plain English
      Examples kept back and never shown to the model while it learns, then used to find out how well it really works.
      Think of it like this
      The mock exam: questions you have not seen, used to check what you actually know.Where that stops working: A mock only tells you about the topics it covers. A test set that leaves out some people tells you nothing about those people.
      At work
      Testing is where a team finds out who a system fails. The Teach the machine game shows why that has to be checked group by group.
    • Training data

      Also called: training set

      In plain English
      The examples a model learns from. What goes in shapes what comes out.
      Think of it like this
      The textbook a student revises from. If the textbook leaves out a topic, the student will not know it however clever they are.Where that stops working: A student can notice a gap and go looking. A model cannot, unless a person spots it first.
      At work
      Someone has to collect, check and label training data, and the quality of the whole system depends on it.

    For teachers

    The Curriculum Translator

    Pick an activity to see which curriculum statements it supports, or pick a statement to see which activities cover it. We have used only wording we read on the Department for Education's own pages, and we have been straight about where artificial intelligence is not named in the curriculum at all, and about what is only a plan so far.

    Show the curriculum links for

    Where it comes fromWhat the curriculum saysActivities that support it
    Maths, national curriculum“appropriate measures of central tendency (mean, mode, median) and spread (range, consideration of outliers)”National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of studyClean the mess, Make the same data say three things
    Maths, national curriculum“construct and interpret appropriate tables, charts, and diagrams”National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of studyMake the same data say three things, Clean the mess
    Maths, national curriculum“describe simple mathematical relationships between 2 variables (bivariate data) in observational and experimental contexts and illustrate using scatter graphs”National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of studyCorrelation is not causation, Teach the machine
    Maths, national curriculum“use and interpret scatter graphs of bivariate data; recognise correlation and know that it does not indicate causation”National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of studyCorrelation is not causation
    Maths, national curriculum“infer properties of populations or distributions from a sample, whilst knowing the limitations of sampling”National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of studyTeach the machine, Discussion: the 2020 grades
    Maths, national curriculum“interpret and construct tables and line graphs for time series data”National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of studyMake the same data say three things
    Maths, national curriculum“make predictions; interpolate and extrapolate apparent trends”National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of studyMake the same data say three things, Predict the next word
    Maths, national curriculum“use a probability model to predict the outcomes of future experiments”National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of studyPredict the next word
    Computing, national curriculum“understand how data of various types (including text, sounds and pictures) can be represented”National curriculum in England: computing programmes of studyYour data trail, Clean the mess
    Computing, national curriculum“including collecting and analysing data and meeting the needs of known users”National curriculum in England: computing programmes of studyClean the mess, Make the same data say three things, From raw data to a decision
    Computing, national curriculum“use technology safely, respectfully, responsibly and securely, including protecting their online identity and privacy”National curriculum in England: computing programmes of studyYour data trail, Before you paste it in
    GCSE computer science“the ethical, legal and environmental impacts of digital technology on wider society, including issues of privacy and cyber security”GCSE subject content for computer scienceDiscussion: the 2020 grades, Teach the machine, Your data trail, Before you paste it in
    Planned, from September 2028“The refreshed curriculum will teach pupils AI literacy, how to use data to complete tasks and solve problems, as well as learning about bias in technology.”Government response to the Curriculum and Assessment ReviewTeach the machine, Predict the next word, Clean the mess, Discussion: the 2020 grades, Before you paste it in

    Be aware of the limits

    • The national curriculum computing programmes of study (published in 2013) and the GCSE computer science content do not use the words artificial intelligence or machine learning. Data is named in only a few of the computing statements above, so most of the links here are to maths.
    • The last row is a plan, not a curriculum. The government's November 2025 response says the revised national curriculum is due to be published by spring 2027, for first teaching from September 2028, and that it will replace the computer science GCSE with a computing GCSE and explore a new level 3 qualification in data science and AI. Explore is the government's word, so do not tell students that qualification exists.
    • The maths statements are the programmes of study for England. Check your own exam board's specification for how it covers statistics and probability at GCSE.
    • The curriculum statements here come from the school curriculum, because that is where the wording is published. If you teach an FE, vocational or apprenticeship course, check your awarding body's specification for the matching content.
    • All of this is for England. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have their own curricula, and curriculum documents are reviewed from time to time, so check the current version for your school.

    Straight answers

    Questions students, parents and colleagues ask

    Do students have to be brilliant at maths or coding to work in data and AI?

    No, though it depends which part you mean, and it is worth being straight about that. The Career Matrix splits the field into nine areas of work, and some of them, such as machine learning, lean heavily on maths and programming. Others are about decisions, rules and people, such as governance and ethics, product management and operations.

    The government's AI labour market survey is also clear that computer science is still the dominant qualification, and that roles increasingly include people who studied social sciences such as psychology and philosophy. Most organisations hire people from jobs that had nothing to do with AI before, which suggests the doors are not as narrow as the stereotype.

    Is it worth encouraging students into this? Will AI not take the jobs?

    Nobody can promise the future, and we would not trust anyone who did. What we can do is tell you what the evidence says today. The latest government study estimates the UK AI sector employed around 130,000 people in 2025, up by about half on the year before, though it asks you to treat year-on-year growth with care because part of it is better counting. A separate survey found 35% of organisations had AI vacancies they struggled to fill, mostly because candidates lacked work experience.

    The honest reading is that employers are short of people who can do the work and have shown they can, which is why the routes that let students build real experience, such as apprenticeships and projects, matter so much. The government has also said it will teach students AI literacy and how to use data in a refreshed curriculum, which is a sign that these skills are expected to matter well beyond a few specialist jobs.

    Is it cheating if students use AI tools for homework?

    That depends on the task and on your school's policy, and for anything that counts towards a qualification it depends on the awarding body's rules. The Department for Education says schools, colleges and awarding organisations need to keep taking reasonable steps to prevent AI-related malpractice in formal assessments, and it points to the JCQ guidance, which you should read in its current version before you set coursework.

    For everyday homework the more useful question is what the student is learning. In a 2026 survey about a quarter of young people said they simply copied AI outputs, and that was higher among students receiving free school meals, so it may be worth thinking about who has the most to lose from copying. The activities here are designed to make students better at questioning what a tool tells them, which helps whatever your policy is.

    Can I put students' names or work into an AI tool to save time?

    The Department for Education recommends that personal data is not used in generative AI tools. If you think you need to, check with your data protection officer or IT lead first and make sure the data is protected in the tool and not used to train it. Schools also have to say in their privacy notice how any AI tools collect, process and store data.

    Students' original work has a separate rule: schools and colleges must not allow it to be used to train generative AI models unless they have permission, or an exception to copyright applies. The NCSC adds a simple habit for everyone, which is not to put sensitive information into a public chatbot, because the query will be visible to the organisation providing it.

    Why do chatbots get things wrong, and say them so confidently?

    Because of how they work. The NCSC describes a large language model as an algorithm trained on lots of text that turns the relationships between words into a probability model, and then uses it to answer. It is working out what is likely to come next, which is not the same as checking what is true. The Predict the next word activity lets your class watch this happen in a model small enough to read in full.

    Both the NCSC and the DfE are blunt about the result. The NCSC says these models can hallucinate incorrect facts and give convincing-sounding answers that may be only partially correct, particularly on niche topics. The DfE says the content they produce needs critical judgement to check it is accurate and appropriate.

    What is the difference between AI, machine learning and data science?

    These are overlapping words rather than separate boxes, and people use them loosely, so here is a plain version. AI is the broad label for computer systems that do things that seem to need intelligence. Machine learning is one way of building them, by showing a program many examples and letting it find the pattern. Data science is the wider practice of using data and statistics to answer questions, which sometimes involves machine learning and often does not.

    It is also worth knowing for planning that the national curriculum computing programmes of study and the GCSE computer science content do not use the words artificial intelligence or machine learning at all. The government has said the refreshed curriculum will teach AI literacy, and that is a plan, not yet a curriculum.

    Why does it matter who works in AI, and where are the women?

    The 2025 labour market survey found women accounted for 20% of AI roles, down 4 percentage points since 2020. That is worth sharing with your students, whoever they are.

    There is also a reason that goes beyond fairness. The Gender Shades study found a very large gap in how a set of commercial systems worked for different groups. We cannot say from that study that a different team would have prevented it, but it shows why testing a system on the people it will be used on matters, and why people with different experiences are useful when deciding what to test.

    How does someone actually get into this without a degree?

    There are routes, and the Career Matrix sets them out. The best-known is the Data analyst apprenticeship, a Level 4 standard that typically takes 24 months and describes the job as collecting, organising and studying data to provide business insight. The Matrix also lists a Level 3 Data technician route into it, and a Level 6 degree apprenticeship into machine learning engineering.

    In the government's survey, 19% of organisations used apprentices for junior AI roles, up from 3% in 2020, and graduate routes were still the most common at 60%. So apprenticeships are growing, and they are one road among several, not a replacement for the others. The same survey found 88% of organisations rely on on-the-job training, which suggests that what students can show they have already done is likely to count.

    How reliable are the numbers you quote?

    Every figure on this page comes from a named source we opened and read on the date shown, with the condition the source puts on it, and some of those conditions are significant. The AI sector study calls its estimates experimental and says year-on-year comparisons should be treated with care. The labour market survey had 119 responses and the authors warn that people who respond may differ from those who do not.

    We would rather you taught students to ask that question about every number they meet than to trust ours. If you spot something that has changed, tell us and we will fix it.

    Coming from employers

    From the industry

    Resources shared by employers

    The first employer resources are on their way. If you work for an employer with a TechSkills portal account, you can share a resource from your portal and it will appear here once it has been reviewed.

    Articles and stories

    • Same CV, 800 times: why AI-written applications vanish, and what to do about it

      Claire MacLeod is a Gen Z career coach and founder of Career Pathfinder. Before that she spent twenty years in executive search, recruiting senior professional staff for UK universities. She works one-to-one with young people to help them find a direction and land work they are genuinely excited about.In this article she shares how to get the visibility for your CV that you want. __careerpathfinder.me__

    • Industry Insights

      The Learner's Edge in the AI Era

      AI tools are now part of everyday working life, and entry-level roles are feeling the pressure. In this article, Blessed Pepple, Founder at Setlwork, argues that technical skill matters more than ever, because it is what helps you spot when AI output looks right but isn't. He then sets out five human capabilities, drawn from established research, that help learners act on that judgement: reflective practice, emotional intelligence, resilience, self-efficacy and adaptive communication. Each comes with a practical tip to try.

    • Industry Insights

      Never Stop Wondering: Why Curiosity Is the Missing Skill in AI Upskilling

      Asking questions is how we learn, yet many of us stop doing it far too early. For Daniel, founder of Galagog and former Amazon employee, that moment came in a Year 8 chemistry lesson, and it has shaped his thinking ever since. Having supported thousands of people to use technology, data and AI more confidently in their work, he sees the same hesitation everywhere: capable people holding back, waiting for permission, convinced they are "not technical". In this thoughtful piece, Daniel makes the case for curiosity as an essential skill in an AI-driven world, and explains why educators and employers have a shared role in giving people the confidence to experiment, question and grow.

    • Industry Insights

      Beyond the Silos: Why the UK's 2035 Economic Ambitions Require an Open Infrastructure

      techUK argues the UK's digital infrastructure is at a genuine turning point: keep building isolated, incompatible platforms and risk 'platform sprawl', or commit to open, standardised architecture that keeps skills and systems portable across cloud, government and industry.

    • Policy & Research

      What It Takes to Scale the Responsible Adoption of Agentic AI

      Drawing on a four-part 2026 workshop series, techUK sets out what it actually takes to move agentic AI beyond pilots - covering technical readiness, organisational ownership, workforce AI literacy and governance - alongside what it wants from government.

    • Industry Insights

      The Future of Digital Talent Starts with Better Questions About Skills, Judgement and AI

      Dr Mohammad Hossein Amirhosseini discusses AI, employer engagement and the role of industry-aligned learning in preparing the next generation of digital professionals at the University of East London.

    Over the coming months this is where employers will add their own articles, videos, lesson ideas and day-in-the-life stories for teachers. Nothing appears here until the TechSkills team has read it and published it, and every piece names the organisation that shared it.

    Where to next

    Careers guides for Data and AI

    Every area of work in Data and AI, the routes in, pay and hiring, and the skills employers ask for, with sources and dates, are in our Data and AI guides. There is one for teachers and one for careers advisers.

    Show your working

    Sources and how we checked them

    Each source below was opened and read on 1 November 2026, and every figure on this page is the one the source gives, with the condition the source puts on it. Where a source warns about its own figures, as the AI sector study and the labour market survey both do, we pass the warning on. If you spot something that has changed, tell us and we will fix it.

    1. Artificial Intelligence sector study 2025Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (research by Perspective Economics, with Beauhurst and Ipsos). Published 29 October 2026.Used for: The number of UK AI companies, the people they employ, revenue, where they are registered, and how the report says its figures should and should not be compared.
    2. AI Labour Market Survey 2025 reportDepartment for Science, Innovation and Technology (research by Gardiner & Theobald). Published 28 January 2026.Used for: Skills gaps, hard-to-fill vacancies, how people get into AI roles, the subjects they studied, training and who is in the workforce.
    3. Young people, teachers' and parents' use of AI to support literacy in 2026National Literacy Trust. Listed 18 August 2026 (survey carried out in early 2026).Used for: How many young people and teachers use generative AI, and how students say they use it for homework.
    4. Student Generative AI Survey 2026 (HEPI Report 199)Higher Education Policy Institute, sponsored by Kortext. Published 12 March 2026.Used for: How UK undergraduates use generative AI, which tells a teacher what their students will meet next.
    5. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in educationDepartment for Education. Last updated 12 August 2025 (England).Used for: What the DfE says about personal data, copyright, safeguarding, accuracy, assessment and teacher use of generative AI.
    6. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) and data protection in schoolsDepartment for Education. Published 3 February 2023, updated 14 October 2026 (England).Used for: What schools should do before personal data goes into an AI tool, and what the privacy notice must say.
    7. ChatGPT and large language models: what's the risk?National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC). Published 14 March 2023.Used for: How the NCSC describes what a large language model is, why it can be wrong, and what not to type into one.
    8. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender ClassificationJoy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru, Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (PMLR volume 81, pages 77 to 91). 2018.Used for: A published test showing that an average can hide a system working much worse for one group of people.
    9. Summer 2020 results analysis: GCSE, AS and A level (update to the interim report)Ofqual. December 2020.Used for: How often the 2020 calculated grade matched, beat or fell below the teacher-based grade, and what the final grade was.
    10. Ofqual annual report and accounts 2020 to 2021Ofqual. Chair's foreword dated 8 July 2021.Used for: Ofqual's own account of why the 2020 approach was changed, and the dates of the change.
    11. Automated decision-making and profiling (draft guidance)Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). Updated 31 March 2026; the page says it is draft guidance under consultation.Used for: The kind of decision the law gives people safeguards about: solely automated, with a legal or similarly significant effect.
    12. National curriculum in England: computing programmes of studyDepartment for Education. Published 11 September 2013 (England only).Used for: The computing statements on representing data and on collecting and analysing it. Neither artificial intelligence nor machine learning is named.
    13. National curriculum in England: mathematics programmes of studyDepartment for Education. Published 11 September 2013, last updated 28 September 2021 (England only).Used for: The statistics and probability statements in the national curriculum, including correlation, sampling and scatter graphs.
    14. GCSE subject content for computer scienceDepartment for Education. Updated 31 March 2025, for teaching from 2025 (England only).Used for: The GCSE content on ethical, legal and environmental impacts. Neither artificial intelligence nor machine learning is named.
    15. New curriculum to give young people the skills for life and workDepartment for Education. Published 4 November 2025.Used for: The timetable for the revised national curriculum and the plan for a computing GCSE and a data science and AI qualification.
    16. Government response to the Curriculum and Assessment ReviewDepartment for Education. November 2025.Used for: What the government says the refreshed curriculum will teach about AI, data and bias in technology.
    17. Data centres to be given massive boost and protections from cyber criminals and IT blackoutsDepartment for Science, Innovation and Technology. Published 12 September 2024.Used for: The decision to designate data centres as Critical National Infrastructure.
    18. Data analyst (standard ST0118, version 1.1)Skills England (apprenticeship standards). Version 1.1, which the page says is approved for delivery but being revised.Used for: The level, typical length and purpose of the data analyst apprenticeship.
    19. Regulator calls on new and existing drone users to learn new rules before taking offCivil Aviation Authority (CAA). Published 29 December 2025.Used for: The UK drone rules in force from 1 January 2026, for a school with a survey drone or a drone club.
    20. TechSkills Career Matrix and Career PlannerTechSkills. Pay, hiring and route data last checked from 11 July 2026.Used for: The nine areas of Data and AI work, their roles, the hands-on routes and pay, each with its own source and date in the career guides.

    This page is general information to help with teaching. It is not legal advice, and for England the curriculum links should be checked against the version your school currently follows.